Years ago I saw an interview with one of my artistic heroes, the great filmmaker John Carpenter, where he was asked what did he think of the "Saw" series. "I think they're tremendously funny," he replied with a completely straight face.
It's hard to explain what makes me laugh.
When I think of my favorite comedies, movies like "The Naked Gun" and "Monty Python and The Holy Grail" immediately leap to mind. I love "Airplane" and "Top Secret" and "Real Genius" and "Revenge of the Nerds" and "There's Something About Mary" and "Dumb and Dumber" and "Zoolander".
On the stage, I love Christopher Durang and on the page I bow at the feet of Douglas Adams.
I could go on and on about the stories that everyone else thinks are funny that I also think are funny.
But then there are the other stories.
Like Mary Harron and Christian Bale's version of "American Psycho".
Like the Paul Verhoeven trifecta: "RoboCop", "Total Recall", and "Starship Troopers".
Or "Re-Animator" or "Creepshow II" or parts of "John Carpenter's The Thing" or even "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre".
And let's not even get into the local news.
There's absurdity and irony and excess all around us every day. While most people would shake their heads and turn their eyes away, I honestly cannot help but laugh. It's almost involuntary. The bigger the crazy, the more over the top, the louder I laugh. And the more serious the people in these situations take their absurdity, the funnier it is.
What's even funnier is that most people are so hyper-aware of the circumstances, but so incredibly unaware of the very irony they create.
I'm reminded of a joke from Bill Maher about the proctologist who complains that he has to look at asses all day.
But even as I write these things, I feel like they could be coming out of Heath Ledger's mouth in "The Dark Knight".
Maybe, in the end, the biggest joke is on me, after all.
Wouldn't that be funny?
I guess my own lack of self-awareness is part of the genesis of my protagonist in "33 Ways To Kill My Husband
". But the honest truth is I owe a big debt on this story to my fiance. I just hope she doesn't take it to heart. :-)
There are certain times of the year that tickle my heart as a filmmaker and a deep lover of movies. I love February, when all of the classic Oscar-winning films suddenly get new life on TV. I love December, when your favorite holiday movies return while the studios generally offer the highest quality films they've made all year. I love May, when the biggest, loudest popcorn movies of the summer come roaring into the multiplexes.
But my dirty little secret is that I love the month of October most of all.
I love scary movies. And these 31 days are the days that they all rise like zombies, shambling across the quiet countryside to frighten a new generation. These old horror films are like old friends:
The tightly coiled maniacal genius of a medical student who can Re-Animate the dead.
The terrible thing Creeping inside the crate beneath the university staircase.
The little boy in the clown costume with the butcher knife on Halloween night.
The puzzle box that Raises a little Hell every time someone is fiendish enough to try to solve it.
The Thing inside that snow dog running across the Anarctic.
I could talk about Val Lewton and William Castle. I could talk about Vincent Price and Peter Cushing. I could talk about Universal and Hammer and Dimension and Artisan and Lions Gate.
In many ways, I think a good horror film is the highest order of filmmaking. Think of the skill it takes to craft a movie that can terrify and amuse, that can horrify but still attract repeat viewings, that can attract the best talent, that can push the boundaries of special effects.
Psycho
Jaws
Alien
The Silence of the Lambs
Cape Fear
I could go on and on and on.
But I won't.
I'll just ask you to turn on the TV or go to the theater, hold on to your sweetheart, and enjoy the rush of getting the daylights scared out of you for the next two weeks.
Do you have those movies that you've seen so many times that you've actually forgotten the first time?
I'm like that with "John Carpenter's The Thing". I think it's pretty safe to say that it is, hands down, my favorite horror movie of all time. I practically know it by heart. I re-watch it and study the evolving (or should I say deteriorating) relationships among the group of fairly ordinary men in an Artic research station that is infiltrated by a shape shifting alien that can perfectly imitate any animal it can devour.
I think it's a perfect horror movie. It's tense and scary. It's got great laugh out loud moments. It's pretty original. And it's super bleak.
It's funny to me that Carpenter himself worships the original movie, "The Thing From Another World", where the alien is basically a Frankenstein monster made of vegetables who fertilizes new versions of himself using human blood. It's such a weird, quirky movie with the stereotypical stupid scientist. But it also has some great jump out moments and a great end line:
"Tell the world, tell everyone: Watch the skies everywhere, keep looking, keep watching the skies!"
But, frankly, I don't find "The Thing From Another World" scary at all. For my money, the original "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" trumps it in every way: scare factor, Cold War paranoia, direction, performance... it even has a better end line:
"They're here already! YOU'RE NEXT!!!"
That said, I can appreciate that The Thing From Another World comes from a different era in horror moviemaking, so I can excuse Carpenter's affection. Especially because I so appreciate what he did with his own take on the film. By returning to the original source material, John Campbell's novella, "Who Goes There?", Carpenter rediscovered the true paranoia and horror of this unwelcome visitor from another planet.
What's interesting to me in reading the Campbell story is the intelligence that's implied about the monster by the investigating scientists. While a reviewer of the current prequel to Carpenter's film (which we'll get to in a moment) asks how such a creature could evolve through natural selection, Campbell assumes that the creature has developed the science that allows it to adapt to any environment at a cellular level. They even assume that they've never seen its natural form, that even its ship was something it had appropriated from another species it had imitated.
Which is what is so great about Carpenter's film - the thing isn't just a monster. In many ways, it's smarter than the humans and is constantly a few steps ahead of them, deliberately sowing the seeds of mistrust as it swallows them up, one by one.
It's this intelligence, this cunning, that is the single biggest thing I miss the most in the new prequel, "The Thing", with Mary Elizabeth Winstead. But, don't get me wrong. I actually love this movie. It really takes the horror aspects of the franchise to a new level. For fans of the Carpenter film, the way the two-faced thing is born in this film has to be one of the most horrifying scenes in any movie I've seen in some time. The effects are crazy and the cast is great. Mary Elizabeth really reminds me of Naomi Harris in "28 Days Later". As my better half said, by the end of the film, what she's experienced, you cannot take any chances. You have to be as hard core as possible.
But her survival hinges on the way the thing chooses to attack her early in the film. Frankly, it's sloppy and not nearly as clever as it is in the Carpenter movie.
Then again, it is a prequel. Maybe the Norwegian camp taught the thing a thing or two.
There was a time when "Love At First Bite" was too much for me to handle as a horror movie.
For those of you who don't remember, that was the comedy where George Hamilton (who made being orange kewl way before anybody had ever heard of John Boehner) plays a bumbling, comedic Dracula in the modern world. And, if my memory is correct, that movie largely came about in response to the success of John Badham's "Dracula", starring Frank Langella as the count and Laurence Olivier as Van Helsing. Which, of course, comes well before Coppola's early 90's remake with Gary Oldman and Anthony Hopkins, and well after the long line of Hammer Films' Dracula movies with Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing. And let's not even get into Bela Lugosi and the classic Universal "Dracula", or Max Schrek and "Nosferatu".
In short, for as long as we've had movies, particularly horror movies, we've had remakes.
Now, it's pretty fashionable to cry and moan about how remakes suck and the filmmakers have no respect for the original films. But, let's be real about this:
John Carpenter's "The Thing"
David Croenberg's "The Fly"
Philip Kaufman's "Invasion of the Body Snatchers"
Zack Synder's "Dawn of the Dead"
(yes, I'm going to go there) Rob Zombie's "Halloween"
Those are just some movies that I can tick off from memory that are all remakes of great movies that are actually great movies in their own right. Heck, even the original Fright Night, which I absolutely adore, is a very self-referential nod to those old Hammer vampire movies ("Peter Vincent"? Come ON! :-)).
Yes, there are plenty of remakes that suck (I'm looking at you, Vince Vaughn "Psycho"). But even Hitchcock did a remake of one of his own movies, namely "The Man Who Knew Too Much". And, frankly, there are plenty of original movies that suck, too. I think, in the end, we have to evaluate all of these movies on their own merits.
I LOVE that Carpenter "Thing" movie. But, after seeing this trailer, I am all over the prequel:
I remember someone once asked Alan Moore how did he feel about Hollywood ruining his books like From Hell and League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. Moore simply pointed to the books on his shelf and said "see, my books are just fine."
Those old movies will always be there, and these remakes may just give them new life.
I'll never forget Chris Sarandon as Jerry Dandridge.